From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

JAIN v. RICH

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 2009
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 51134 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)

Opinion

2008-1644 W C.

Decided June 2, 2009.

Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of Yonkers, Westchester County (Charles D. Wood, J.), entered April 6, 2007. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,475.

Judgment affirmed without costs.

PRESENT: RUDOLPH, P.J., MOLIA and SCHEINKMAN, JJ.


Plaintiff brought the instant small claims action seeking the sum of $1,475, representing the balance of the security deposit he gave to defendant, his former landlord. At the nonjury trial, defendant sought a setoff, asserting that his house had been damaged when plaintiff had moved out, that the stove in plaintiff's apartment required repair and that the apartment was left very dirty and had to be cleaned. Defendant presented no expert witnesses, receipts or estimates, however, to support his assertions. The City Court subsequently awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,475 and noted in its decision that defendant had failed to provide any receipts for alleged damages, cleaning or stove repair to offset the amount demanded by plaintiff.

Substantial justice has been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law ( see UCCA 1807). It was incumbent upon defendant to submit expert testimony, an itemized receipt/invoice marked paid or two itemized estimates in support of the items of damage upon which he was basing his claim for a setoff ( see UCCA 1804). A review of the record presented discloses that defendant failed to do so. While there are matters contained in defendant's brief which are dehors the record on appeal, these cannot be considered herein since this court is limited to reviewing matters contained in the settled record ( Paris v Oyesanya , 22 Misc 3d 141[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 50433[U] [App Term, 2d, 11th 13th Jud Dists 2009]; see Chimarios v Duhl, 152 AD2d 508, 508-509).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Rudolph, P.J., Molia and Scheinkman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

JAIN v. RICH

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 2009
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 51134 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)
Case details for

JAIN v. RICH

Case Details

Full title:ANUBMAV JAIN, Respondent, v. DAVID RICH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 2, 2009

Citations

2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 51134 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)