From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jaimes v. Kramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 16, 2006
No. CIV S-06-1788 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1788 GEB KJM P.

August 16, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a letter stating his request to proceed in forma pauperis is pending. In his application, petitioner challenges a conviction issued by the Fresno County Superior Court. Fresno County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 3-120(d).

As provided by Local Rule 3-120(f), a civil action that has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721


Summaries of

Jaimes v. Kramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 16, 2006
No. CIV S-06-1788 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2006)
Case details for

Jaimes v. Kramer

Case Details

Full title:JUAN ANTONIO JAIMES, Petitioner, v. M.C. KRAMER, Warden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 16, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1788 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2006)