Opinion
3:21-cv-00360-RCJ-CLB
10-11-2022
RICHARD JAGGARD and JUDY JAGGARD, Plaintiffs, v. ABBOTT CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INC., a California corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.
OSHINSKI & FORSBERG, LTD. MARK FORSBERG, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 4265 RICK OSHINSKI, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 4127 Attorneys for Plaintiffs GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI Dione C. Wrenn, Esq. BRIAN MOONEY, ESQ. California Bar No. 143795 (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) DIONE C. WRENN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13285 Attorneys for Defendant
OSHINSKI & FORSBERG, LTD.
MARK FORSBERG, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 4265
RICK OSHINSKI, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 4127
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI
Dione C. Wrenn, Esq.
BRIAN MOONEY, ESQ.
California Bar No. 143795
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
DIONE C. WRENN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13285
Attorneys for Defendant
ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANT ABBOTT CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INC.'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROBERT C. JONES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
In accordance with LR 7-1, Plaintiffs, Richard Jaggard and Judy Ann Jaggard (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Abbott Cardiovascular Systems Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On September 22, 2022, Defendant filed its Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF 32].
2. Plaintiffs' deadline to file a reply to the opposition is October 6, 2022.
3. Plaintiffs request additional time to file their reply to the opposition, up to and including ii imi
4. Defendant does not oppose Plaintiffs' requested extension.
5. Accordingly, Plaintiffs will file their reply to Defendant's opposition no later than October 21, 2022.
This stipulation is not made for purposes of delay.