From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jagatpal v. Chamble

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
May 21, 2019
172 A.D.3d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

9381 Index 161749/15

05-21-2019

Gowkarran JAGATPAL, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Michelle CHAMBLE, etc., et al., Defendants–Respondents, Jodel Leneus, et al., Defendant.

Roth & Roth, LLP, New York (Elliot Shields of counsel), for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Antonella Karlin of counsel), for respondents.


Roth & Roth, LLP, New York (Elliot Shields of counsel), for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Antonella Karlin of counsel), for respondents.

Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Tom, Kapnick, Oing, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (W. Franc Perry, J.), entered on December 19, 2017, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the motion of defendants Michelle Chamble, Angela Brown, and the City of New York (the municipal defendants) for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The municipal defendants cannot be held liable for plaintiff's injuries, even if the traffic officers were negligent, because the officers were involved in the discretionary governmental function of traffic control (see Balsam v. Delma Eng'g Corp. , 90 N.Y.2d 966, 968, 665 N.Y.S.2d 613, 688 N.E.2d 487 [1997] ; Devivo v. Adeyemo , 70 A.D.3d 587, 894 N.Y.S.2d 747 [1st Dept. 2010] ) and plaintiff failed to plead or show that there was a special relationship owed to him (see Valdez v. City of New York , 18 N.Y.3d 69, 77, 936 N.Y.S.2d 587, 960 N.E.2d 356 [2011] ).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Jagatpal v. Chamble

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
May 21, 2019
172 A.D.3d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Jagatpal v. Chamble

Case Details

Full title:Gowkarran Jagatpal, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michelle Chamble, etc., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: May 21, 2019

Citations

172 A.D.3d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
98 N.Y.S.3d 741
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 3934

Citing Cases

Mendez v. The City of New York

Indeed, plaintiff testified that he did not make eye contact with Gomez. In any event, since Gomez was…

Mendez v. City of N.Y.

Indeed, plaintiff testified that he did not make eye contact with Gomez. In any event, since Gomez was…