From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jaffe Hough, P.C. v. Baine

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 10, 2010
CIVIL NO. 09-3000 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 10, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 09-3000.

March 10, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 10th day of March, 2010, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 2] and Plaintiff's Response in Opposition [Doc. No. 5], it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows:

1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a breach of contract claim is GRANTED. Plaintiff's breach of contract claim, found in paragraphs 26 through 30 of its Complaint [Doc. No. 1], is DISMISSED without prejudice; and

2) All other claims made by Defendants in their Motion to Dismiss are DENIED. Plaintiff's claim for quantum meruit remains before this Court.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jaffe Hough, P.C. v. Baine

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 10, 2010
CIVIL NO. 09-3000 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Jaffe Hough, P.C. v. Baine

Case Details

Full title:JAFFE HOUGH, P.C., Plaintiff, v. LAURA AND MICHAEL BAINE, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 10, 2010

Citations

CIVIL NO. 09-3000 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 10, 2010)

Citing Cases

Orazi v. Hilton Hotels Corp.

Defendants' motion requests dismissal on grounds of improper venue, or in the alternative transfer "on the…