From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jaeckle v. L. Bamberger Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 24, 1936
184 A. 520 (N.J. 1936)

Opinion

Submitted February term, 1936.

Decided April 24th, 1936.

On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, whose opinion is reported in 119 N.J. Eq. 126.

Mr. Sydney A. Gutkin ( Mr. I. Herbert Levy, of counsel), for the appellants.

Messrs. Pitney, Hardin Skinner ( Mr. Charles R. Hardin, of counsel), for the respondent.


The decree dismissing the bill of complaint is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the learned vice-chancellor.

The question of the jurisdiction of equity to grant the relief sought by complainants is reserved.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, JJ. 9.

For reversal — LLOYD, PERSKIE, RAFFERTY, JJ. 3.


Summaries of

Jaeckle v. L. Bamberger Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 24, 1936
184 A. 520 (N.J. 1936)
Case details for

Jaeckle v. L. Bamberger Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES E. JAECKLE and WILBUR F. AURNHAMMER, on behalf of themselves, c.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 24, 1936

Citations

184 A. 520 (N.J. 1936)
184 A. 520

Citing Cases

Weston v. N.J. State Bd. of Optometrists

The mere fact that the Westons were employed by Towne Company, a corporation, is not sufficient to sustain…

N.J. Optometric Ass'n v. Hillman-Kohan

The Court of Errors and Appeals, however, in affirming that decision expressly reserved the question of…