From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacques v. Bank of America Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION
Jul 20, 2012
Case No.: 1:12-cv-00821-LJO-DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2012)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:12-cv-00821-LJO-DLB

07-20-2012

TROY JACQUES, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, aka BANK OF AMERICA N.A.; FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP., a Florida corporation; EARLY WARNING SERVICES, LLC, a limited liability company, and DOES 1 through 50, Defendants.

HENRY Y. CHIU Attorneys for Plaintiff TROY JACQUES EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP PATRICIA S. RIORDAN Attorneys for Defendant BANK OF AMERICA, CORPORATION aka BANK OF AMERICA, N.A COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP KEITH M. WHITE Attorneys for Defendant FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP ROGER L. SCOTT Attorneys for Defendant EARLY WARNING SERVICES, LLC


DOUGLAS TUCKER 172550

HENRY Y. CHIU 222927

MOSS, TUCKER, CHIU, HEBESHA & WARD PC

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

TROY JACQUES

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE

TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

AND TO CONTINUE MANDATORY

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Plaintiff TROY JACQUES and defendants BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, aka BANK OF AMERICA N.A., FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP., and EARLY WARNING SERVICES, LLC (collectively "the Parties") are currently in the process of exploring an informal resolution of the present action. In light of the upcoming litigation deadlines, the Parties respectfully request the following:

1. that Defendants' time to respond to the Amended Complaint be extended by sixty (60) days. Defendants were served with the Amended Complaint on July 12, 2012, thereby making their response due on or before August 2, 2012. The Parties jointly agree to extend the deadline for Defendants to file their responses by sixty (60) days to October 1, 2012.

2. that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for July 31, 2012 (and its related deadlines), be continued at least sixty (60) days.

MOSS, TUCKER, CHIU, HEBESHA & WARD PC

By: ______________

HENRY Y. CHIU

Attorneys for Plaintiff

TROY JACQUES

EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP

By: ______________

PATRICIA S. RIORDAN

Attorneys for Defendant

BANK OF AMERICA, CORPORATION

aka BANK OF AMERICA, N.A

COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP

By: ______________

KEITH M. WHITE

Attorneys for Defendant

FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND

SERVICES CORP

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

By: ______________

ROGER L. SCOTT

Attorneys for Defendant

EARLY WARNING SERVICES, LLC

ORDER

Having considered the parties' Stipulation, this Court hereby ORDERS as follows:

1. The last day for the Defendants' to respond to the Amended Complaint is hereby extended to October 1, 2012.

2. The Mandatory Scheduling Conference is continued to October 29, 2012 at 9:00 am. A Joint Statement is due one week before the conference. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Jacques v. Bank of America Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION
Jul 20, 2012
Case No.: 1:12-cv-00821-LJO-DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Jacques v. Bank of America Corp.

Case Details

Full title:TROY JACQUES, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Jul 20, 2012

Citations

Case No.: 1:12-cv-00821-LJO-DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2012)