Opinion
November 4, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.).
Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Under the circumstances herein, we agree with Special Term's finding that the defendant has sufficiently responded to plaintiff's interrogatory No. 26, which sought information regarding other lawsuits filed against the defendant involving alleged adverse reactions to Neo-Mull-Soy, a baby formula manufactured and sold by defendant. Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.