Opinion
Case No. 2:16-cv-00332-MMD-VCF
10-11-2016
CRAIG L. JACOBSEN, JR., Plaintiff, v. HON. MICHAEL DOUGLAS, et al., Defendants.
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE CAM FERENBACH
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach (ECF No. 10) ("R&R") relating to plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) and pro se complaint (ECF No. 5). Plaintiff had until August 22, 2016, to file an objection. No objection to the R&R has been filed.
This Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where a party timely objects to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, then the court is required to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where a party fails to object, however, the court is not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge's report and recommendation where no objections have been filed. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2003) (disregarding the standard of review employed by the district court when reviewing a report and recommendation to which no objections were mad2e); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (reading the Ninth Circuit's decision in Reyna-Tapia as adopting the view that district courts are not required to review "any issue that is not the subject of an objection."). Thus, if there is no objection to a magistrate judge's recommendation, then the court may accept the recommendation without review. See, e.g., Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d at 1226 (accepting, without review, a magistrate judge's recommendation to which no objection was filed).
Nevertheless, this Court finds it appropriate to engage in a de novo review to determine whether to adopt Magistrate Judge Ferenbach's R&R. Upon reviewing the R&R and proposed complaint, this Court finds good cause to accept and adopt the Magistrate Judge's R&R in full.
It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach (ECF No. 10) is accepted and adopted in its entirety.
It is ordered that plaintiff's application to proceed in form pauperis (ECF No. 1) is granted; plaintiff will not be required to pay an initial fee.
It is further ordered that the complaint (ECF No. 5) is dismissed with prejudice.
The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this Order and closed this case.
DATED THIS 11th day of October 2016.
/s/_________
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE