From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacobs v. Woodall

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Feb 27, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-CV-713-TMH (M.D. Ala. Feb. 27, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-CV-713-TMH

02-27-2012

STANCIL EARL JACOBS, #264146, Plaintiff, v. CARLA WOODALL, Defendant.


ORDER

The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #13) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that

1. The Recommendation (Doc. #13) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;

2. The defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED;

3. This case is dismissed with prejudice; and

4. The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff.

A separate judgment shall issue.

Truma n M. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jacobs v. Woodall

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Feb 27, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-CV-713-TMH (M.D. Ala. Feb. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Jacobs v. Woodall

Case Details

Full title:STANCIL EARL JACOBS, #264146, Plaintiff, v. CARLA WOODALL, Defendant.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 27, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-CV-713-TMH (M.D. Ala. Feb. 27, 2012)