From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacobs v. Sullivan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 2, 2012
1:05-cv-01625-LJO-GSA (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)

Opinion

1:05-cv-01625-LJO-GSA (PC)

07-02-2012

GEORGE E. JACOBS IV, Plaintiff, v. W. J. SULLIVAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER FOR DEFENSE COUNSEL TO FILE

STATUS REPORT CONCERNING DEFENDANT

CROTTY WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

Plaintiff George E. Jacobs IV ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action now proceeds on the Third Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff on May 5, 2010, against defendants Crotty, Nelson, Watson, Chan, McGregor, Alexander, Carrasco, Blankenship, Jobb, Granillo, Johnson, and Salazar aka Adams, for violation of Plaintiff's rights under the Eighth Amendment. (Doc. 29.)

On June 23, 2011, the Court stayed this action as to defendant Crotty pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a), pending resolution of defendant Crotty's bankruptcy proceedings. (Doc. 58.) At this juncture, defense counsel shall be required to file a status report informing the Court of the status of defendant Crotty's bankruptcy proceedings.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days from the date of service of this order, defense counsel shall file a status report informing the Court of the status of Defendant Crotty's bankruptcy proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Gary S. Austin

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Jacobs v. Sullivan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 2, 2012
1:05-cv-01625-LJO-GSA (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Jacobs v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE E. JACOBS IV, Plaintiff, v. W. J. SULLIVAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 2, 2012

Citations

1:05-cv-01625-LJO-GSA (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)