From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacobs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 14, 2003
839 So. 2d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 2D02-4166

Opinion filed March 14, 2003.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Ralph Artigliere, Judge.


Robert Jacobs challenges the order of the trial court denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Jacobs argues that his three year minimum mandatory sentence is illegal based on Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla.2d DCA 2002). We affirm the order of the trial court because Jacobs' motion is facially insufficient as he does not affirmatively allege that his date of offense falls within the window created by Taylor. We note, however, that the trial court did not dismiss Jacobs' motion as facially insufficient. Instead, in its August 19, 2002 order, it dismissed Jacobs' motion without prejudice to refile when the Florida Supreme Court had reviewed the decision in Taylor. On May 29, 2002, the State filed a voluntary dismissal of said review in State v. Taylor, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla. 2002) (table). Our affirmance is therefore without prejudice to Jacobs' filing a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion.

FULMER and KELLY, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Jacobs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 14, 2003
839 So. 2d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Jacobs v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT A. JACOBS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 14, 2003

Citations

839 So. 2d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)