From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacobs v. Pittsburgh Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 10, 2014
Civil Action No. 08 - 470 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 10, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08 - 470

07-10-2014

ANDRE JACOBS, Plaintiff, v. PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.


Chief District Judge Joy Flowers Conti

Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan


MEMORANDUM ORDER

AND NOW, this 10th day of July, 2014, after Defendants having filed Motions to Dismiss, which were converted into Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 320 & 321); and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by Chief United States Magistrate Judge Lenihan on June 5, 2014, (ECF No. 366), recommending that the Motions be denied to the extent Defendants seek revocation of Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status for violation of the "three strikes rule" codified in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that the Motions be denied without prejudice to the extent that Defendants seek dismissal for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); and after no objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed by the June 23, 2014 deadline; and upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation and an independent review of the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 366) is ADOPTED as the Opinion of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Motions for Summary Judgment filed by the Allegheny County Defendants (ECF No. 320) and the Nurse Defendants (ECF No. 321) are DENIED to the extent they seek revocation of Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status and DENIED without prejudice to the extent they seek dismissal for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. Motions may be refiled closer to the trial of this matter so that the Court may conduct an evidentiary hearing and make a determination about the factual disputes on the issue of exhaustion of Plaintiff's administrative remedies.

By the Court:

__________

Joy Flowers Conti

Chief United States District Judge
cc: Andre Jacobs

DQ 5437

SCI-Albion

10745 Route 18

Albion, PA 16475

(Via First Class Mail)

Counsel of Record

(Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail)


Summaries of

Jacobs v. Pittsburgh Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 10, 2014
Civil Action No. 08 - 470 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 10, 2014)
Case details for

Jacobs v. Pittsburgh Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE JACOBS, Plaintiff, v. PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jul 10, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 08 - 470 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 10, 2014)

Citing Cases

Defranco v. Miller

The Defendants in this action have properly pled and presented their exhaustion defense for disposition by…