From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacobs v. Bolling

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 9, 2017
Case No. 2:17-cv-01006-LSC-JEO (N.D. Ala. Nov. 9, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2:17-cv-01006-LSC-JEO

11-09-2017

ROBERT LEE JACOBS, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN BOLLING, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The magistrate judge filed a report on October 17, 2017, recommending this action be dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Doc. 12). Although the magistrate judge advised the plaintiff of his right to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days, no objections have been received by the court.

Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge's report is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), this action is due to be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

A Final Judgment will be entered.

DONE AND ORDERED ON NOVEMBER 9, 2017.

/s/_________

L. SCOTT COOGLER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

160704


Summaries of

Jacobs v. Bolling

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 9, 2017
Case No. 2:17-cv-01006-LSC-JEO (N.D. Ala. Nov. 9, 2017)
Case details for

Jacobs v. Bolling

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LEE JACOBS, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN BOLLING, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 9, 2017

Citations

Case No. 2:17-cv-01006-LSC-JEO (N.D. Ala. Nov. 9, 2017)