Opinion
April, 1897.
Herman Herst, for appellant.
William King Hall, for respondent.
The sole question in dispute herein is: Did the plaintiff perform the duties required from him by virtue of his contract with the defendant? That question of fact, in our opinion, was properly submitted to the jury and the evidence fully justifies their finding in plaintiff's favor and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.
Present: VAN WYCK, Ch. J., McCARTHY and FITZSIMONS, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.