From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacksonville Christian Academy v. Arkansas Social Services

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nov 15, 1982
641 S.W.2d 716 (Ark. 1982)

Opinion

No. 82-119

Opinion delivered November 15, 1982

1. INJUNCTION — PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ISSUED WITHOUT NOTICE — HEARING SHALL BE HELD AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE. — Upon application by the party against whom the preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order has been issued without notice, the Court shall, as expeditiously as possible, hold a hearing to determine whether the preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order should be dissolved. [ARCP Rule 65(b).] 2. INJUNCTION — COURT MAY ORDER ACTION ON MERITS CONSOLIDATED WITH HEARING ON THE APPLICATION. — Where a hearing is required to be held on an application for a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order, the Court may order the trial of the action on the merits advanced and consolidated with the hearing on the application; ARCP Rule 65 (b) does not contemplate a trial on the merits at the time of the temporary hearing unless the trial court has ordered the proceedings consolidated. 3. INJUNCTION — WITHOUT NOTICE TO THE PARTIES, THERE CAN BE NO TRIAL ON THE MERITS. — Where there was no order to consolidate a trial on the me"its with the hearing on the application, no notice to the appellant that the hearing was to be a trial on the merits, and no answer filed by the appellant and the time for filing had not yet expired, but a trial on the merits was held at the same time as the hearing on the application for dissolution of the temporary restraining order, the case must be reversed and remanded for another trial.

Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court, First Division; Lee A. Munson, Chancellor; reversed and remanded.

Larry C. Honeycutt of Harmon Honeycutt, for appellant.

Steve Clark, Atty. Gen., by: Robert L. Waldrum, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Judieth P. Balentine, Atty. Supervisor, Arkansas Social Services, for appellee.


Appellee, Arkansas Social Services, secured, ex parte, a temporary restraining order under Ark. Stat. Ann. 83-915 (Repl. 1976) enjoining appellant, Jacksonville Christian Academy, from providing day care service to preschool children. At the same time the trial court set a hearing to determine if the temporary restraining order should be dissolved. This was done pursuant to ARCP Rule 65 (b), Ark. Stat. Ann., Vol. 3A (Repl. 1979) which provides:

Upon application by the party against whom the preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order has been issued without notice, the Court shall, as expeditiously as possible, hold a hearing to determine whether the preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order should be dissolved. Where a hearing is required to be held on an application for a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order, the Court may order the trial of the action on the merits advanced and consolidated with the hearing on the application. When consolidation is not ordered, any evidence received upon application for a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order which would be admissible upon the trial on the merits becomes a part of the record of the trial and need not be repeated upon the trial. This subdivision (b) shall be so construed and applied as to save to the parties any rights they may have to trial by jury. (Emphasis supplied)

However, instead of holding a hearing on whether the temporary restraining order should be dissolved, the hearing actually became a trial on the merits of the case. Rule 65 (b) does not contemplate a trial on the merits at the time of the temporary hearing unless the trial court has ordered the proceedings consolidated; and, no such order was made in this case. Appellant had no notice that the hearing was to be a trial on the merits, and at the time of the hearing appellant had not filed an answer or had the time for doing so expired.

Appellant argues that the religious exemption clause of Act 518 of 1981, Ark. Stat. Ann. 83-918 (Supp. 1981), is unconstitutional. But, we do not reach this issue since the trial court's judgment does not disclose to what extent, if any, the constitutionality of the statute was considered.

For these reasons we reverse and remand for trial.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Jacksonville Christian Academy v. Arkansas Social Services

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nov 15, 1982
641 S.W.2d 716 (Ark. 1982)
Case details for

Jacksonville Christian Academy v. Arkansas Social Services

Case Details

Full title:JACKSONVILLE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY v. ARKANSAS SOCIAL SERVICES

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 15, 1982

Citations

641 S.W.2d 716 (Ark. 1982)
641 S.W.2d 716