From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Wray

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Sep 25, 2023
Civil Action 3:23-CV-0558-M-BH (N.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:23-CV-0558-M-BH

09-25-2023

NAKISHA JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER WRAY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

BARBARA M. G. LYNN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. By separate judgment, the plaintiff's claims against all the federal defendants will be DISMISSED without prejudice sua sponte for failure to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).


Summaries of

Jackson v. Wray

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Sep 25, 2023
Civil Action 3:23-CV-0558-M-BH (N.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Jackson v. Wray

Case Details

Full title:NAKISHA JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER WRAY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Sep 25, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 3:23-CV-0558-M-BH (N.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2023)