From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. B.C Williams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 14, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1261 WBS EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1261 WBS EFB P.

September 14, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On June 17, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days from the date the findings and recommendations were served. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 17, 2011, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's access to the courts claim is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2);

3. Defendant's September 10, 2010 motion for summary judgment is denied as moot; and

4. This action proceeds solely on plaintiff's retaliation claim.


Summaries of

Jackson v. B.C Williams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 14, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1261 WBS EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Jackson v. B.C Williams

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND D. JACKSON, SR., Plaintiff, v. B.C. WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 14, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1261 WBS EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2011)