From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Westchester Auto Credit Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 17, 1944
267 App. Div. 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Opinion

March 17, 1944.

Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents in the following memorandum:


Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


This was not a sale on credit but a sale of credit. The consideration charged for the credit extended was excessive under sections 352, 357 and 358 of the Banking Law, and therefore the conditional sales agreement was void. Accordingly, I dissent and vote to reverse and grant judgment for plaintiff.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Westchester Auto Credit Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 17, 1944
267 App. Div. 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)
Case details for

Jackson v. Westchester Auto Credit Corporation

Case Details

Full title:SARA W. JACKSON, Appellant, v. WESTCHESTER AUTO CREDIT CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 17, 1944

Citations

267 App. Div. 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Knickerbocker Operating Co.

Since 1850, when the Court of Appeals in Brooks v. Avery (supra) laid down this principle, the courts of this…

Flatbush Auto v. McCarthy-Bernhardt Buick

verse the judgment and to direct the entry of judgment in favor of appellant, with the following memorandum:…