From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Warden, FCI McDowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD
Aug 19, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-00149 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 19, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-00149

08-19-2020

HOWARD JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN, FCI McDowell, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion asking the court to stay his deadline for filing a response to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, entered on April 24, 2020. ECF No. 21. According to plaintiff, his need for additional time is because of a lockdown implemented at his facility due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The deadline for filing objections passed more than three months ago. The court cannot let this case drag on indefinitely. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion is GRANTED insofar as he requests additional time to file his objections and his objections are due on or before September 16, 2020. To the extent that plaintiff requests an indefinite stay, his motion is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel of record and to plaintiff, pro se.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of August, 2020.

ENTER: /s/_________

David A. Faber

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Jackson v. Warden, FCI McDowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD
Aug 19, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-00149 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 19, 2020)
Case details for

Jackson v. Warden, FCI McDowell

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN, FCI McDowell, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD

Date published: Aug 19, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-00149 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 19, 2020)