From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2019
Case No. CV 17-6278-ODW (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. CV 17-6278-ODW (JEM)

01-04-2019

GEORGE L. JACKSON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: January 4, 2019

/s/_________

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jackson v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2019
Case No. CV 17-6278-ODW (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2019)
Case details for

Jackson v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE L. JACKSON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 4, 2019

Citations

Case No. CV 17-6278-ODW (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2019)