Opinion
Civil Action 99-1793
07-03-2024
HUBERT JACKSON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN DONALD T. VAUGHN, et al., Respondents.
ORDER
Joy Flowers Conti Senior United States District Judge
AND NOW, this 3rd day of June, 2024, upon consideration of: (1) petitioner's Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 60(b)(4) (ECF No. 42), which appears to be his sixth Rule 60(b) motion filed in this case; (2) the magistrate judge's report and recommendation that the motion be denied (ECF No. 43), which the court has reviewed de novo; (3) petitioner's objections (ECF No. 44); and (4) the Court having notified the petitioner on September 22, 2014 with respect to his third such motion that filing repetitious Rule 60(b) motions which reargue prior motions will result in the those motions being summarily denied (ECF No. 30);
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's sixth Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4) (ECF No. 42) is DENIED. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the court.