From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Thompson

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 13, 2011
3:04-cv-00738-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Oct. 13, 2011)

Opinion

3:04-cv-00738-HDM-WGC.

October 13, 2011


ORDER


On July 7, 2011, a Minute Order (Doc. #65) was issued advising the parties that defendants Scott and Seals cannot be served "until better addresses are obtained." The Court stated that this case "will have to proceed without them." The record reflected that "Plaintiff indicates his understanding."

Because more than 120 days have passed since the filing of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint without service of process having been effected on defendants Scott and Seal (Doc. #53, 5/2/11), plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is therefore DISMISSED as to defendants Scott and Seals. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).

DATED: October 12, 2011


Summaries of

Jackson v. Thompson

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 13, 2011
3:04-cv-00738-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Oct. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Jackson v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS K. JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. JOYCE THOMPSON, ROBERT LeGRAND…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 13, 2011

Citations

3:04-cv-00738-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Oct. 13, 2011)