Jackson v. Thomas

Full title: Ris'e D. Jackson, Sheena Sophia Jackson, and Joel Barry Jackson, II…

Court: THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-450 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-450

10-11-2011

Ris'e D. Jackson, Sheena Sophia Jackson, and Joel Barry Jackson, II, Respondents, v. Michael Shawn Thomas, Alex J. Newton, Household Asset Co., Inc., Defendants, Of whom Michael Shawn Thomas and Household Asset Co., Inc. are Appellants.

Zandra L. Johnson, of Greenville, for Appellants. David Charles Alford, of Spartanburg, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Greenville County

Charles B. Simmons, Jr., Master In Equity

APPEAL DISMISSED

Zandra L. Johnson, of Greenville, for Appellants.

David Charles Alford, of Spartanburg, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM : Michael Shawn Thomas and Household Asset Company, Inc. appeal the circuit court's granting of a motion to restore the matter to the active trial docket. Because the order on appeal grants a motion to restore, it is not a final judgment and is not immediately appealable. See Shields v. Martin Marietta Corp., 303 S.C. 469, 470, 402 S.E.2d 482, 483 (1991) ("The decision on a motion to restore the case to the active docket is not a final judgment and is interlocutory and, therefore, not immediately appealable."). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.