From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jun 30, 2005
472 Mich. 942 (Mich. 2005)

Summary

In Jackson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 472 Mich. 942 (2005), our Supreme Court, in lieu of granting leave to appeal, vacated a judgment entered by this Court and reinstated an order of summary dismissal entered by the trial court "for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissent."

Summary of this case from Defrain v. State Farm

Opinion

No. 127379 (49).

June 30, 2005.


SC: 127379, COA: 246388, Wayne CC: 01-116994-NF.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 5, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REINSTATE the order of the Wayne Circuit Court for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissent. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CAVANAGH and Kelly, JJ., would deny leave to appeal.


Summaries of

Jackson v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jun 30, 2005
472 Mich. 942 (Mich. 2005)

In Jackson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 472 Mich. 942 (2005), our Supreme Court, in lieu of granting leave to appeal, vacated a judgment entered by this Court and reinstated an order of summary dismissal entered by the trial court "for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissent."

Summary of this case from Defrain v. State Farm
Case details for

Jackson v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLOTTE JACKSON, Personal Representative of the Estate of Alvin Cook…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jun 30, 2005

Citations

472 Mich. 942 (Mich. 2005)
698 N.W.2d 400

Citing Cases

DeFrain v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the case to the trial court for entry…

Lasalle Group, Inc. v. JST Properties, L.L.C.

Thus, the Court cannot conclude as a matter of law that LaSalle's failure to satisfy the bond's notice…