From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 19, 2003
840 So. 2d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 3D02-2694.

Opinion filed March 19, 2003.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction — Writ of Mandamus. Lower Tribunal No. 01-460.

Douglas M. Jackson, Sr., in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for respondent.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and RAMIREZ, J., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.


ON PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Petitioner has filed a motion to enforce our prior writ of mandamus issued in this case. We deny the motion because the relief the petitioner now seeks is different from the relief we granted in the prior writ of mandamus. Petitioner seeks to enforce an order directing the circuit court to accept a suit petitioner filed against Horace Sermon and a complaint attached in which petitioner listed Aramark Food Service Corp. and Ivan Williams as defendants. The current motion, however, seeks to enforce mandamus in a different suit filed against defendant S. Mangham Tate.

Denied.


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 19, 2003
840 So. 2d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS M. JACKSON, SR., Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 19, 2003

Citations

840 So. 2d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)