From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Apr 3, 2018
Cause number: 01-17-00416-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 3, 2018)

Opinion

Cause number: 01-17-00416-CR

04-03-2018

Aaron Lloyd Jackson v. The State of Texas


ORDER ON MOTION

Type of motion: Motion to Terminate Appointed Counsel, Juan M. Contreras, Jr. Party filing motion: Pro Se Appellant Aaron Lloyd Jackson Document to be filed: N/A Ordered that motion is:

[ ] Granted
[ ] Denied
[v] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
[v] Other: __________
On October 19, 2017, appellant's appointed counsel, Juan M. Contreras, Jr., filed a brief on the merits and the State filed an appellee's brief on December 13, 2017. To date, no motion to withdraw has been filed by appellant's counsel. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5. Accordingly, appellant's pro se notice, construed as a motion to terminate his appointed counsel, Juan M. Contreras, Jr., is dismissed as moot because he is currently represented by counsel, is not entitled to hybrid representation, and his counsel filed a brief on the merits. See Ex parte Taylor, 36 S.W.3d 883, 887 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (stating "[a]ppellants are not allowed to have hybrid representation" and appellant did not have right to file documents with appellate court while represented by counsel). Appellant's counsel, Juan M. Contreras, Jr., is directed to contact the pro se appellant regarding his motion.
Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

[v] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court Date: April 3, 2018 November 7, 2008 Revision


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Apr 3, 2018
Cause number: 01-17-00416-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Aaron Lloyd Jackson v. The State of Texas

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Apr 3, 2018

Citations

Cause number: 01-17-00416-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 3, 2018)