From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Nov 5, 2015
No. 04-15-00655-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2015)

Opinion

No. 04-15-00655-CR

11-05-2015

Matthew Jamal JACKSON, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee


From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2014CR0148
Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant has filed a pro se motion for substitution of counsel. The motion is DENIED. See United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 151 (2006) ("[T]he right to counsel of choice does not extend to defendants who require counsel to be appointed for them."); Maes v. State, 275 S.W.3d 68, 71 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, no pet.) ("A defendant does not have the right to choose appointed counsel . . . .").

/s/_________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 5th day of November, 2015.

/s/_________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Nov 5, 2015
No. 04-15-00655-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2015)
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Matthew Jamal JACKSON, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Nov 5, 2015

Citations

No. 04-15-00655-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2015)