Opinion
No. 04-15-00655-CR
11-05-2015
Matthew Jamal JACKSON, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2014CR0148
Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding
ORDER
Appellant has filed a pro se motion for substitution of counsel. The motion is DENIED. See United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 151 (2006) ("[T]he right to counsel of choice does not extend to defendants who require counsel to be appointed for them."); Maes v. State, 275 S.W.3d 68, 71 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, no pet.) ("A defendant does not have the right to choose appointed counsel . . . .").
/s/_________
Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 5th day of November, 2015.
/s/_________
Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court