Opinion
Nos. 05-05-00219-CR, 05-05-00220-CR
Opinion Filed February 21, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F02-72440-UP, F02-73205-KP. Affirmed.
Before Justices MORRIS, MOSELEY, and FITZGERALD.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Jesse Jermaine Jackson pleaded guilty to burglary of a habitation and aggravated robbery. Pursuant to plea bargain agreements, in each case, the trial court deferred adjudicating guilt, placed appellant on ten years' community supervision, and assessed a $1500 fine. The State later moved to adjudicate appellant's guilt in each case, alleging several probation violations. Appellant pleaded true to the allegations in the motions to adjudicate guilt, and, following a hearing, the trial judge adjudicated appellant guilty. The judge sentenced appellant to fifteen years' imprisonment for the burglary and thirty years' imprisonment for the aggravated robbery. Appellant's attorney filed briefs in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The briefs present a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered copies of the briefs to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's briefs. We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals. We affirm the trial court's judgments.