From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Dec 16, 2008
271 S.W.3d 634 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. ED91563.

December 16, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Steven H. Goldman, Judge.

Edward S. Thompson, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant,

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.



ORDER


Movant, Melvin Jackson, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his counsel rendered ineffective by misinforming him regarding the sentence he would receive.

The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Dec 16, 2008
271 S.W.3d 634 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Melvin JACKSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Dec 16, 2008

Citations

271 S.W.3d 634 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)