Opinion
No. 05-05-00572-CR
Opinion issued January 24, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F04-53037-N. Affirmed.
Before Justices MORRIS, MOSELEY, and FITZGERALD.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
William Augustus Jackson waived a jury trial and pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine in an amount of one gram or more but less than four grams and true to two enhancement paragraphs. The trial court found appellant guilty of the offense and the enhancement paragraphs true. The judge sentenced appellant to twenty-five years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response, but appellant did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.