Opinion
No. CR-00-1756.
Decided September 28, 2001.
Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court, Bessemer Division (CC-99-381.60).
Kenneth Jackson, appellant, pro se.
Bill Pryor, atty. gen., and Stephen N. Dodd, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.
AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.
McMillan, P.J., and Baschab and Wise, JJ., concur; Shaw, J., concurs in the result, with opinion; Cobb, J., dissents, with opinion;
The petitioner's convictions were final before June 26, 2000, when the United States Supreme Court decided Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000); therefore, in my view, Apprendi does not apply. See my special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, August 31, 2001] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Crim.App. 2001) (Shaw, J., concurring in the result).
I disagree with the majority's opinion because it affirms the issue addressing the petitioner's Apprendi claim. I believe that the petitioner's challenge to his sentence enhancement is entitled to further review. See my special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, August 31, 2001] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Crim.App. 2001).