From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Aug 26, 2008
No. 01-07-01019-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 26, 2008)

Opinion

No. 01-07-01019-CR

August 26, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 1115861.

Panel consists of Justices NUCHIA, ALCALA, and HANKS.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant, Marcus Jackson, pleaded guilty to the offense of murder and, in accordance with the plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for 50 years. Along with the plea, appellant, appellant's counsel, and the State signed a stipulation of evidence which included, among others, the following statements: "I intend to enter a plea of guilty and understand that the prosecutor will recommend that my punishment should be set at 50 years TDCJ; I agree to that recommendation. . .Further, I waive my right of appeal which I may have should the court accept the foregoing plea bargain agreement between myself and the prosecutor." The trial court's judgment is stamped, "Appeal waived. No permission to appeal granted." After the trial court sentenced appellant to punishment that fell within the terms of the plea bargain agreement, the trial court certified that this case is a plea bargain case and the defendant has no right to appeal. Despite waiving his right to appeal the appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal and requested the appointment of counsel. This appeal followed. Appellant's counsel on appeal has filed a brief stating that the record presents no reversible error, that the appeal is without merit and is frivolous, and that the appeal must be dismissed or affirmed. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, (1967). The brief meets the requirements of Anders by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and detailing why there are no arguable grounds for reversal. Id. at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; see also High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 810 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). Counsel represents that he has served a copy of the brief on appellant. Counsel also advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. Having reviewed the record and counsel's brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit and that there is no reversible error. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27(Tex.Crim.App. 2005). Further, we find that the certification of the right of appeal filed by the trial court is supported by the record and that appellant has no right of appeal due to the agreed plea bargain. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal "without further action." Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex.Crim.App. 2006). Any pending motions are denied as moot.


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Aug 26, 2008
No. 01-07-01019-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 26, 2008)
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS JACKSON Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Aug 26, 2008

Citations

No. 01-07-01019-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 26, 2008)