From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Nov 16, 1990
572 So. 2d 1321 (Ala. Crim. App. 1990)

Opinion

CR 89-1273.

November 16, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Jefferson County, J. Richmond Pearson, J.

John Rufus Jackson, pro se.

Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and P. David Bjurberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


The appellant, John Rufus Jackson, appeals from the summary denial of his petition filed under Rule 20, A.R.Crim.P.Temp. The appellant alleged in his petition that he was denied equal protection in that he was sentenced as a repeat offender, and, he says, his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily made and his trial counsel was ineffective. The State of Alabama has asked this court to remand this case to the Circuit Court for Jefferson County, because that court made no findings of fact as required by Rule 20.9(d), A.R.Crim.P.Temp. It further asks that a transcript of the evidentiary hearing be furnished to it.

After reviewing the record, we agree with the State. This case is remanded to the Circuit Court for Jefferson County so that the trial court can make "written findings of fact relating to each material issue of fact presented." See Rule 20.9(d). A copy of those findings, along with said documentation, including a transcript of the evidentiary hearing, is to be filed with this court no later than 90 days from release of this decision.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur.


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Nov 16, 1990
572 So. 2d 1321 (Ala. Crim. App. 1990)
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:John Rufus JACKSON v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Nov 16, 1990

Citations

572 So. 2d 1321 (Ala. Crim. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Lynch v. State

After reviewing the record, we deem it necessary to remand this case to the Circuit Court for Butler County…

Howington v. State

Although the trial court denied this petition after a hearing "to determine disputed issues of material…