Summary
holding that Jackson's claim was not jurisdictional because he argued only that the venire was not sworn
Summary of this case from Jackson v. StateOpinion
No. CR-02-0866.
August 22, 2003.
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
holding that Jackson's claim was not jurisdictional because he argued only that the venire was not sworn
Summary of this case from Jackson v. StateNo. CR-02-0866.
August 22, 2003.
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
holding that Jackson's claim was not jurisdictional because he argued only that the venire was not sworn
Summary of this case from Jackson v. StateFull title:ARMOND JOSEPH JACKSON v. STATE
Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Date published: Aug 22, 2003
) See also this Court's no-opinion affirmance of the denial of that petition. Jackson v. State (No.…