From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 26, 1994
639 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 92-1852.

July 26, 1994.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Henry G. Ferro, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and N. Joseph Durant, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Francine Thomas, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before COPE, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.


Alfonso Jackson appeals an order denying post-conviction relief. The State concedes that defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing at which he will have an opportunity to show that his failure to return from furlough was excusable or justifiable such that his violation of the furlough agreement was involuntary. See Rodriguez v. State, 600 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Walker v. State, 599 So.2d 233, 234 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Walker v. State, 578 So.2d 514, 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Absent defendant's showing of a legally sufficient excuse for failure to return from furlough, the thirty-year sentence will stand. We reject defendant's argument that the plea bargain itself was illegal. See Quarterman v. State, 527 So.2d 1380 (Fla. 1988).

Reversed and remanded for evidentiary hearing.


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 26, 1994
639 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALFONSO JACKSON, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 26, 1994

Citations

639 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Holmes v. State

Therefore, defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing to establish that his failure to report following…