From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 12, 2010
47 So. 3d 378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 5D10-2877.

November 12, 2010.

Petition Alleging Ineffectiveness of Appellate Counsel, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Tommy Bernard Jackson, East Palatka, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann M. Phillips, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.


Tommy Jackson petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus based upon a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel for failure to file a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). He claims his attorney should have challenged the legality of his drug offender probation. We agree.

Jackson was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to sell, which is not one of the enumerated offenses for which drug offender probation can be imposed under section 948.20, Florida Statutes (2007). Therefore, we grant Jackson's petition and remand to the lower court so that Jackson's drug offender probation can be converted to regular probation with or without special conditions, as the court deems appropriate. See Taylor v. State, 17 So.3d 310, 311 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009); State v. Roper, 915 So.2d 622, 623-24 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

PETITION GRANTED and CAUSE REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, EVANDER, and JACOBUS JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 12, 2010
47 So. 3d 378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tommy Bernard JACKSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Nov 12, 2010

Citations

47 So. 3d 378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

However, our review of the motion and the State's response supports Smith's position that his challenge to…