From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 9, 2002
811 So. 2d 765 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 4D01-5055.

March 6, 2002. Rehearing Denied April 9, 2002.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ilona M. Holmes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 88-8347 CF10A.

Quinton Jackson, Miami, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


We affirm the order summarily denying appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001):

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

WARNER, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 9, 2002
811 So. 2d 765 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:QUINTON JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 9, 2002

Citations

811 So. 2d 765 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)