From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 13, 1987
507 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Summary

In Jackson even if possession had been proven it was "just as reasonable a theory that appellant had received the packets from one or the other of the people in the car as it is that he was engaged in the trafficking activity (i.e., R.C. 2925.03[A][2]).

Summary of this case from State v. Arrington

Opinion

No. 86-2104.

May 13, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; John S. Andrews, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Brad Permar, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corces, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Affirmed on the authority of McGinty v. State, 463 So.2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 13, 1987
507 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

In Jackson even if possession had been proven it was "just as reasonable a theory that appellant had received the packets from one or the other of the people in the car as it is that he was engaged in the trafficking activity (i.e., R.C. 2925.03[A][2]).

Summary of this case from State v. Arrington
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES JACKSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 13, 1987

Citations

507 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

State v. Arrington

Columbus v. Russell (1973), 39 Ohio App.2d 139, 140 [68 O.O.2d 327, 327, 316 N.E.2d 897, 898]." State v.…