Summary
In Jackson even if possession had been proven it was "just as reasonable a theory that appellant had received the packets from one or the other of the people in the car as it is that he was engaged in the trafficking activity (i.e., R.C. 2925.03[A][2]).
Summary of this case from State v. ArringtonOpinion
No. 86-2104.
May 13, 1987.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; John S. Andrews, Judge.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Brad Permar, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corces, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
Affirmed on the authority of McGinty v. State, 463 So.2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).
RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.