From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 18, 2022
338 So. 3d 1094 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D21-2852

05-18-2022

Ronald Lee JACKSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Ronald Lee Jackson, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Ronald Lee Jackson, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Because the trial court has ruled on the filing pending below, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Ward v. State , 770 So. 2d 206, 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (denying a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the motion pending below).

Bilbrey, Winokur, and Long, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 18, 2022
338 So. 3d 1094 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ronald Lee JACKSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: May 18, 2022

Citations

338 So. 3d 1094 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)