From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 10, 2022
644 S.W.3d 353 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

WD 84404

05-10-2022

Jerel JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Katharine P. Curry, for Appellant. Gregory L. Barnes, Jefferson City, for Respondent.


Katharine P. Curry, for Appellant.

Gregory L. Barnes, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge and W. Douglas Thomson, Judge

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jerel Jackson appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion after an evidentiary hearing. In two points on appeal, Jackson claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 29.15 motion. Jackson claims appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to raise on appeal that the trial court erred in denying Jackson's motion to exclude testimony and for sanctions due to the State's failure to timely disclose impeachment information including a co-defendant's guilty plea transcript and a crime lab report. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided an unpublished memorandum to the parties which sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 10, 2022
644 S.W.3d 353 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jerel JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: May 10, 2022

Citations

644 S.W.3d 353 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)