Jackson v. State

Full title: JULIUS LEE JACKSON, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 3, 2012

2:11-cv-3387 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)

Opinion

JULIUS LEE JACKSON, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. No. 2:11-cv-3387 JFM (HC) United States District Court, E.D. California. January 3, 2012

          ORDER

          JOHN F. MOULDS, Magistrate Judge.

         Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis.

         The application attacks a conviction issued by the San Mateo County Superior Court. While both this Court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court , 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in San Mateo County. Id. at 499 n.15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

         Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis; and

         2. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.