From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Mar 26, 2021
314 So. 3d 742 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 5D20-2565

03-26-2021

Anthony M. JACKSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Anthony M. Jackson, Raiford, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.


Anthony M. Jackson, Raiford, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Due to Petitioner's apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgments and sentences in Orange County Circuit Court Case Number 2007-CF-12700-A-O, this Court issued an order directing Petitioner to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered his response and finding it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that he is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings.

Therefore, in order to conserve judicial resources, the Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the above referenced case. Any future filings regarding the referenced case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) ("Enough is enough."). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2018) ; Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Future Pro Se Filings PROHIBITED.

EDWARDS, HARRIS and SASSO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Mar 26, 2021
314 So. 3d 742 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY M. JACKSON, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 26, 2021

Citations

314 So. 3d 742 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)