From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Sloan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 23, 2015
CASE NO. 1:15-cv-782 (N.D. Ohio Jun. 23, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:15-cv-782

06-23-2015

THEODORE JACKSON, PETITIONER, v. BRIGHAM SLOAN, RESPONDENT.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 22, 2015, petitioner Theodore Jackson filed this action for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1 [Petition].) The petition alleges that Jackson is incarcerated despite the fact that his sentence has expired. For the reasons stated below, this action must be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

A second or successive motion under § 2254 may not be filed without leave from the appropriate court of appeals. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3). This is at least the second petition filed by Jackson in this court challenging the calculation of his sentence. In a petition filed in another case, that claim was denied with prejudice as non-cognizable on habeas review. See Jackson v. Sloane, N.D. Ohio Case No. 1:13-cv-1326 (Doc. No. 39 [Report and Recommendation] at 853 and Doc. No. 60 [Memorandum Opinion and Order] at 1124). There are no grounds set forth in the instant petition which are newly ripened, or that were unripe when the previous petition was filed, or that support any exception to the filing of a second successive petition under 18 U.S.C. § 2244(b). See Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal, 523 U.S. 637, 643, 118 S. Ct. 1618, 140 L. Ed. 2d 849 (1998); Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930, 946, 127 S. Ct. 2842, 168 L. Ed. 2d 662 (2007).

All references to page numbers are to the page identification numbers generated by the Court's electronic filing system. --------

Accordingly, the Court concludes that the instant petition is successive, and this action shall be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. In re Smith, 690 F.3d 809, 810 (6th Cir. 2012) (citing In re Sims, 111 F.3d 45, 47 (6th Cir. 1997)); Keith v LaRose, No. 1:13CV1718, 2014 WL 1369655, at *4 (Mar. 28, 2014) (successive petition transferred to the Sixth Circuit pursuant to Sims).

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 23, 2015

/s/ _________

HONORABLE SARA LIOI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jackson v. Sloan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 23, 2015
CASE NO. 1:15-cv-782 (N.D. Ohio Jun. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Jackson v. Sloan

Case Details

Full title:THEODORE JACKSON, PETITIONER, v. BRIGHAM SLOAN, RESPONDENT.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 23, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. 1:15-cv-782 (N.D. Ohio Jun. 23, 2015)