From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Scott

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 29, 2011
3:04-cv-00738-HDM-RAM (D. Nev. Mar. 29, 2011)

Opinion

3:04-cv-00738-HDM-RAM.

March 29, 2011


ORDER


On March 22, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to extend time to file his second amended complaint (docket #49). Good cause appearing, plaintiff's motion for extension of time is granted. Plaintiff shall file his second amended complaint on or before May 1, 2011.

Plaintiff notes in his motion that he is still unclear regarding whether he has leave to amend his claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). In its order of January 19, 2011, the court dismissed plaintiff's claims pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") because plaintiff set forth no allegations whatsoever that implicated the ADA (docket #44). The court did not grant plaintiff leave to amend his ADA claims. Plaintiff may, however, amend his retaliation and Fourteenth Amendment due process claims. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for extension of time to file his second amended complaint (docket #49) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his second amended complaint on or before May 1, 2011.

DATED: March 28, 2011.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Scott

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 29, 2011
3:04-cv-00738-HDM-RAM (D. Nev. Mar. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Jackson v. Scott

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS K. JACKSON, SR., Plaintiff, v. SHERRI SCOTT, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Mar 29, 2011

Citations

3:04-cv-00738-HDM-RAM (D. Nev. Mar. 29, 2011)