From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Schilhab

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Mar 24, 2022
Civil Action 2:21-CV-00285 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:21-CV-00285

03-24-2022

ROY JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. SIAN SCHILHAB, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS CASE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

NELVA GONZALES RAMOS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On February 7, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock issued a “Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Case for Want of Prosecution” (M&R, D.E. 10). The Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's M&R. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed.

When no timely objection to a magistrate judge's M&R is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge's M&R. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).

Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge's M&R (D.E. 10), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of prosecution.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Schilhab

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Mar 24, 2022
Civil Action 2:21-CV-00285 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Jackson v. Schilhab

Case Details

Full title:ROY JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. SIAN SCHILHAB, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Mar 24, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 2:21-CV-00285 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2022)