From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 2, 2021
CA 20-0398-MU (S.D. Ala. Jul. 2, 2021)

Opinion

CA 20-0398-MU

07-02-2021

CARMISA D. JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

P. Bradley Murray, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff benefits be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), see Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 111 S.Ct. 2157, 115 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991), for further proceedings not inconsistent with this decision. The remand pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g) makes the Plaintiff a prevailing party for purposes of the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 113 S.Ct. 2625, 125 L.Ed.2d 239 (1993), and terminates this Court's jurisdiction over this matter.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 2, 2021
CA 20-0398-MU (S.D. Ala. Jul. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Jackson v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:CARMISA D. JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 2, 2021

Citations

CA 20-0398-MU (S.D. Ala. Jul. 2, 2021)