From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Rayford

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
May 8, 2014
NO. 02-14-00103-CV (Tex. App. May. 8, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 02-14-00103-CV

05-08-2014

KIMBERLY JACKSON APPELLANT v. MILFORD RAYFORD D/B/A M & J RENTAL RAYFORD APPELLEE


FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

On March 27, 2014, and April 9, 2014, we notified appellant in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c) that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $195 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). Appellant has not paid the $195 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court's order of August 16, 2013, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Aug. 16, 2013) (listing fees in courts of appeals).
--------

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Rayford

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
May 8, 2014
NO. 02-14-00103-CV (Tex. App. May. 8, 2014)
Case details for

Jackson v. Rayford

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY JACKSON APPELLANT v. MILFORD RAYFORD D/B/A M & J RENTAL RAYFORD…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: May 8, 2014

Citations

NO. 02-14-00103-CV (Tex. App. May. 8, 2014)