From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Rackley

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 13, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0009 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0009 KJN P.

April 13, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On January 7, 2011, (Dkt. No. 4) plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned. By order filed March 1, 2011, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff's copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

DATED: April 12, 2011


Summaries of

Jackson v. Rackley

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 13, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0009 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Jackson v. Rackley

Case Details

Full title:MIDEL JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. R.J. RACKLEY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 13, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0009 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2011)