From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Poplin

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 2, 2010
393 F. App'x 976 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-6441.

Submitted: August 26, 2010.

Decided: September 2, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00107-GCM).

Samuel R. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Samuel R. Jackson appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. Poplin, No. 3:10-cv-00107-GCM, 2010 WL 966120 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 12, 2010). We also deny Jackson's pending motions to appoint counsel and to amend his complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED:


Summaries of

Jackson v. Poplin

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 2, 2010
393 F. App'x 976 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Jackson v. Poplin

Case Details

Full title:Samuel R. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. H. POPLIN, Programmer…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 2, 2010

Citations

393 F. App'x 976 (4th Cir. 2010)